Thus endeth the ad; time now to quickly summarize my first ChessLecture presentation. I cover the two-bishop sacrifice best known from Lasker-Bauer, but take it a couple of steps further. First, I show a case where it works, despite the absence of some "canonical" feature (something you'd expect to be a part of the procedure, based on the Lasker-Bauer template), and then go on to show an instance where it fails, despite a seemingly ideal set of preconditions. The point is twofold: one should learn as many tactical themes as possible, but realize that the application of the model needs to be checked and not assumed.
Friday, October 30, 2009
Thus endeth the ad; time now to quickly summarize my first ChessLecture presentation. I cover the two-bishop sacrifice best known from Lasker-Bauer, but take it a couple of steps further. First, I show a case where it works, despite the absence of some "canonical" feature (something you'd expect to be a part of the procedure, based on the Lasker-Bauer template), and then go on to show an instance where it fails, despite a seemingly ideal set of preconditions. The point is twofold: one should learn as many tactical themes as possible, but realize that the application of the model needs to be checked and not assumed.