<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/">
<title>The Chess Mind</title>
<link>http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/</link>
<description></description>
<dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
<dc:date>2008-10-10T06:10+00:00</dc:date>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1223621149.shtml" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1222977667.shtml" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1222808511.shtml" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1222546514.shtml" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1221930955.shtml" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1221190116.shtml" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1220579146.shtml" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1220066409.shtml" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
</channel>

<item rdf:about="http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1223621149.shtml">
<title>This Week's ChessVideos Show: Viewer Games!</title>
<link>http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1223621149.shtml</link>
<description>...</description>
<dc:creator>Dennis Monokroussos</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-10-10T06:10+00:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[In what I hope will be a regular feature of my ChessVideos presentations, I take a look this week at several games submitted by viewers. Some of the games were instructive for what the players did right, some for what they did wrong; while still other games were presented for their aesthetic value. Hopefully the blend will prove a success - but we'll see! <a href="http://www.chessvideos.tv/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=3911">Have a look for yourself</a>; the show is free and available on demand.]]></content:encoded>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1222977667.shtml">
<title>This Week's ChessVideos Show: A Correspondence Chess Massacre</title>
<link>http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1222977667.shtml</link>
<description>The title was supplied by the ChessVideos powers-that-be, by the way, not me. I'd only use that if I were the victim! The game is short, it's true, and may give...</description>
<dc:creator>Dennis Monokroussos</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-10-02T20:10+00:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[The title was supplied by the ChessVideos powers-that-be, by the way, not me. I'd only use that if I were the victim! The game is short, it's true, and may give anti-Dragoneers an extra arrow in their quiver. In the video, I also try to make a case for the value of correspondence chess and offer an important tip when it comes to searching for moves in better positions. What is that tip? You'll have to <a href="http://www.chessvideos.tv/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=3858">watch and see</a>. (The show is free, after all, available on demand and requires no special software. So why not?)<br />
<br />
A couple of reminders regarding other recent ChessVideos announcements. First, if you'd like to have me analyze a game of yours for an upcoming show, go <a href="http://www.chessvideos.tv/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=3859">here</a> and follow the directions in the first comment - you never know! Second, last week's show may have been slightly under-advertised, as the post was quickly superseded by its successors. So here's the <a href="http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1222546514.shtml">link</a> to that post, and to <a href="http://www.chessvideos.tv/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=3830">the show itself</a>.]]></content:encoded>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1222808511.shtml">
<title>Want me to analyze your games?</title>
<link>http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1222808511.shtml</link>
<description>...</description>
<dc:creator>Dennis Monokroussos</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-30T21:09+00:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[If so, submit them <a href="http://www.chessvideos.tv/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=3859">here</a>. You'll have to sign up for a ChessVideos.tv account if you don't already have one (it's free), and post the game in PGN, and then your game can be one of the lucky ones chosen.]]></content:encoded>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1222546514.shtml">
<title>This Week's ChessVideos Show: Bishop vs. Knight, part 3</title>
<link>http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1222546514.shtml</link>
<description>...</description>
<dc:creator>Dennis Monokroussos</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-27T20:09+00:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Our series on bishop vs. knight endings concludes (at least for now) with a pro-bishop example. Taken from a 4.Qc2 Nimzo-Indian game of mine from the late 90s, it can be divided into two unequal halves. The first part of the game offered a good demonstration of how to exploit the advantage of the bishop pair, while the second part is more useful in a negative way, displaying a number of pitfalls one can fall victim to in the realization of an advantage. Both parts are very instructive in their different ways - <a href="http://www.chessvideos.tv/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=3830">have a look</a>!]]></content:encoded>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1221930955.shtml">
<title>This Week's ChessVideos Show: Bishop vs. Knight, Part 2</title>
<link>http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1221930955.shtml</link>
<description>As the title ever so subtly indicates, this is the second in a series of video presentations covering the perennial topic of knights against bishops. In the abstract, the pieces are...</description>
<dc:creator>Dennis Monokroussos</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-20T17:09+00:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[As the title ever so subtly indicates, this is the second in a series of video presentations covering the perennial topic of knights against bishops. In the abstract, the pieces are of approximately equal value, but until one plays a purely abstract game of chess, that very general assessment won't be of much value. So we learn through experience what sorts of positions favor one piece or another, and how best to wield each piece - and the rest of our army - in those particular position-types.<br />
<br />
Fortunately, the experience doesn't have to be our own - it's best to learn from others, when possible. <a href="http://www.chessvideos.tv/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=3747">Last week</a> I showed some relatively basic knight vs. bishop endings; this time around, there's just one ending and it's a bit more sophisticated (though still accessible to anyone reading this blog). One of the strengths of the knight is its ability to blockade, and that strength is highlighted by an opposing bishop's inability to touch squares of the opposite color. This simple fact has far-reaching implications, allowing the side with the knight defensive possibilities one might not have expected. Case in point: the game I cover in this week's show, where I escape near-certain loss by the skin of my teeth.<br />
<br />
So whether you watch for the instruction or the drama, or for the special preview of things to come near the end of the presentation, I do hope you'll tune in! The show is free, available on demand, requires no special software and can be viewed <a href="http://www.chessvideos.tv/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=3788">here</a>.]]></content:encoded>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1221190116.shtml">
<title>This Week's ChessVideos Show: Bishop vs. Knight, Part 1</title>
<link>http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1221190116.shtml</link>
<description>Which minor piece is better, the bishop or the knight? As a little experience informs us, the answer is: It depends. Learning what it depends on is part of the process...</description>
<dc:creator>Dennis Monokroussos</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-12T03:09+00:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Which minor piece is better, the bishop or the knight? As a little experience informs us, the answer is: It depends. Learning what it depends on is part of the process of education we all go through, and in <a href="http://www.chessvideos.tv/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=3747">this presentation</a> I try to offer some assistance towards that end. This week I look at some fairly simple cases in which one minor piece or the other is dominant, and in the next week or two I'll look at more complex examples.<br />
<br />
This show is geared primarily at players under approximately 1800 (maybe even a little lower); if you're in that category, I think you'll find the material useful. (If not, you'll let me know!) It's free and available on demand, so you can take advantage of it at your leisure. Enjoy!]]></content:encoded>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1220579146.shtml">
<title>This week's ChessVideos show: Tactics Seen and Unseen</title>
<link>http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1220579146.shtml</link>
<description>Looking through some of my old games, I came across my biggest OTB scalp with the dubious 1.e4 e6 2.c4 anti-French system, a win against IM Jay Bonin. Unfortunately, he played...</description>
<dc:creator>Dennis Monokroussos</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-09-05T01:09+00:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Looking through some of my old games, I came across my biggest OTB scalp with the dubious 1.e4 e6 2.c4 anti-French system, a win against IM Jay Bonin. Unfortunately, he played 2...c5, so we'll never know how he'd have reacted to the lively lines after 2...d5 3.cxd5 exd5 4.Qb3, but the game had its tactically rich moments nevertheless. As the title suggests, the players weren't always up to the challenge at that moments, but that's so much the better for you, dear reader (and hopefully viewer): you can watch, stop the recording at the relevant moments, and see if you can find what my opponent and I missed.<br />
<br />
Whether you outdo us or not, I trust you'll find the game an entertaining one. But see for yourself: the show is free, available on-demand, and doesn't require any special software. Just <a href="http://www.chessvideos.tv/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=3721">click and watch</a>.]]></content:encoded>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1220066409.shtml">
<title>Another ChessVideos show: beating the (very briefly) #1 player in the world in blitz</title>
<link>http://chessmind.powerblogs.com/posts/1220066409.shtml</link>
<description>...</description>
<dc:creator>Dennis Monokroussos</dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-30T03:08+00:00</dc:date>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[A bit of self-congratulation to be found <a href="http://www.chessvideos.tv/forum/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=3689">here</a>, though with appropriate disclaimers and expressions of humility included therein. It's not especially instructive, but hopefully you'll enjoy it anyway!]]></content:encoded>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>