The Chess Mind

By Dennis Monokroussos.
This is a blog for chess fans by a chess fan, one who loves the beauty of the game and wants to share it with those who are like-minded.
Yet the chess mind is not only a chess mind, and other topics, such as philosophy, may appear from time to time. All material copyrighted.

Saturday, July 28, 2007

The ageless wonder at Banja Luka
It's not as strong an event as the Banja Luka tournament famously won by Kasparov in 1979, but while the ongoing tournament there this year isn't exactly Linares, it's not the proverbial chopped liver either. Best of all, with 6 of 9 rounds in the books, it's co-led by none other than Viktor Korchnoi, 76 years old and still going strong. (2610 and going up!) Amazing!

The interesting question is whether it shows what we're all capable of if we continue to work hard at the game and on our physical condition, or if he's just some sort of genetic marvel. I don't mean that we can all be as strong as him, but I wonder if we're capable of continuing to play near our best many years beyond our physical prime. In checkers, Marion Tinsley continued to play at a supreme level right up to his death at the age of 68, and in the realm of physical fitness Jack LaLanne continued performing impressive physical stunts until he was at least 70, while remaining in excellent shape even now, at the age of 92. Many noteworthy philosophers and other academics continued doing outstanding and creative work well into their old age as well, so I'd like to encourage my fellow middle-agers and those beyond to keep working at the game.

I've seen older players - even GMs - who have used the same (often dull) openings for 30 years. Don't be one of them! That's part of Korchnoi's "secret": he's not busy counting up his past achievements, incredible though they are, and living off his laurels. He's willing to learn new things, to shift his opening repertoire around, to discover new ideas, to mix things up and take real risks with players a sixth (!) his age rather than automatically ceding their tactical superiority.

So take some risks and try something new. Variety is the spice of life, learning new openings and working on the game is great for your general cognitive fitness. And if you lose a few more games while making the transition, that's okay too. It's only chess, after all!
Posted by Dennis Monokroussos on Saturday July 28, 2007 at 4:19am. 2 Comments 0 Trackbacks
Opening books and the golden mean
Some players are slaves to opening books; they are likely to possess knowledge without understanding. Other players proudly shun opening books and try to work everything out for themselves. They will understand what they know, but they probably won't know enough. To them, I say this: life is too short to only learn from one's own mistakes!
Posted by Dennis Monokroussos on Saturday July 28, 2007 at 3:54am. 1 Comments 0 Trackbacks

Thursday, July 12, 2007

Last-round draws: an analysis
In the comments section of my post reporting on the World Open's results, "Inky" writes this:

I don't know why anyone is amazed that they all drew - there are no rules against short draws in the World Open. Furthermore none of them wanted to chance a loss and get even less money than splitting 1st through 9th.

Not only did they all draw early, but they hung around like vultures to see if they had to split the prize money with one more. Shabalov and Perelshteyn fought a long hard game. They are two GMs worthy of our admiration. Of course they were both fighting for a $ share in the top group.


Related Posts (on one page):

  1. Last-round draws: an analysis
  2. The World Open Draws to a Close: Everyone Wins
Posted by Dennis Monokroussos on Thursday July 12, 2007 at 7:56pm. 7 Comments 0 Trackbacks