Related Posts (on one page):
- Corus, Round 11 games
- Corus, Round 11: A mini-review
Related Posts (on one page):
Related Posts (on one page):
Related Posts (on one page):

Yesterday Ivan Cheparinov twice refused to shake Nigel Short's hand at the start of their 8th round game in the ongoing Corus tournament in Wijk aan Zee, and was forfeited for his action. Cheparinov and his manager, Silvio Danailov, filed an appeal, correctly, and the matter went to the Appeals Committee. Their decision was that Cheparinov had to apologize, the players had to shake hands, and that they'd have to replay the game today.
And that's what happened. Here's the apology - it's as unconvincing as possible, but they didn't require sincerity or tears:
Dear All,
I accept the decision of the Appeal Committee and on the name of chess ,the chess fans and showing respect to the opinion of my colleagues would like to state the following:
I apologize officially to Mr. Short, to the Organizing Committee and the sponsors of Corus chess tournament.
I am ready to play the game today at 13’30 and will shake hands with Mr.Short according to the decision of the Appeal Committee.
Best regards,
Ivan Cheparinov
Shake hands they did, and you can find a picture of that cheery event here. And then there's the game (which you can replay here). Short won, and in very good style, at that. Best of all are his post-game comments:
"I played a bloody good game." "I was going to quit the tournament but at some point I became determined." "There is a god and he's not Bulgarian."
Gens una sumus, indeed.
Related Posts (on one page):
First, you can find the video of the start of Short-Cheparinov here. Second, I had wondered parenthetically in my post on round 8 of Corus what would happen in Tuesday's Topalov-Kramnik game; you'll find the answer in the aforementioned video link. Here's what it says:
Addendum: Apparently there is no handshake planned for the Topalov-Kramnik game on Tuesday. In an interview an in the Bulgarian sports news agency SportNi Topalov's manager Silvio Danailov was asked: "On Tuesday Topalov plays Kramnik. FIDE has said the players will have to pay a fine of they do not shake hands." Danailov's answer: "I think there will be no shake of hands because nobody will give his hand first."
Related Posts (on one page):
All Related Posts (on one page) | Some Related Posts:
As noted earlier today, the Short - Cheparinov game from the Corus Group B tournament was adjudged a forfeit when Cheparinov twice refused to shake Short's hand at the start of the game. Cheparinov was willing to shake hands after the arbiter was brought into the matter, and as that seems to agree with the actual FIDE rule, Cheparinov filed an appeal. The Appeals Committee agreed, deciding the following:
1. We declare that GM Cheparinov must make a public excuse to GM Short in a written form before 11.00 hours January 21st 2008 for his refusal to shake hands. 2. Then the game between Ivan Cheparinov and Nigel Short has to be replayed on Monday January 21st 2008 at 13.30 hours. 3. Both players must shake hands at the start of the game. 4. Any player failing to comply with the present decision forfeits the game.
More info here.
Related Posts (on one page):
All Related Posts (on one page) | Some Related Posts:
Here's the trick: Insult your future opponents or those they are associated with. That way, when it's time to shake hands at the start of the game, they'll refuse and be forfeited, at least in FIDE events. That's what happened in today's (non-) game between Nigel Short and Ivan Cheparinov. Much more on the matter here, for those who are interested, but I'll reproduce the relevant FIDE rule here:
Any player who does not shake hands with the opponent (or greets the opponent in a normal social manner in accordance with the conventional rules of their society) before the game starts in a FIDE tournament or during a FIDE match (and does not do it after being asked to do so by the arbiter) or deliberately insults his/her opponent or the officials of the event, will immediately and finally lose the relevant game.
What do you think, readers? Is this the dumbest rule ever, an attempt to mandate hypocritical acts of respect for even the most vile opponent? (I mean this as a general point, not a remark about Short in particular.) Or is this a reasonable attempt to put the game above personal disputes and nationalistic squabbles?
Related Posts (on one page):
All Related Posts (on one page) | Some Related Posts:
All Related Posts (on one page) | Some Related Posts:
All Related Posts (on one page) | Some Related Posts:
All Related Posts (on one page) | Some Related Posts:
All Related Posts (on one page) | Some Related Posts:
All Related Posts (on one page) | Some Related Posts:
All Related Posts (on one page) | Some Related Posts:
All Related Posts (on one page) | Some Related Posts:
All Related Posts (on one page) | Some Related Posts:
All Related Posts (on one page) | Some Related Posts: