The Chess Mind

Author: Dennis Monokroussos.
This is a blog for chess fans by a chess fan who is more than a chess fan - other topics do creep in from time to time, per my interest.
All material here is copyrighted, and may not be reproduced without my prior permission.

Thursday, April 28, 2005

The Matous Study: Solution Time
A couple of days ago, I presented a very elegant endgame study by M. Matous for the readers' solving pleasure (and if you solved it, I'm sure you'll agree that it was a pleasure), and now it's time for the solution. As with the Marshall-Capablanca game, I hope the reader will give solving this their best shot before looking at the solution; for those ready to take a look, click, read, and enjoy:


Posted by Dennis Monokroussos on Thursday April 28, 2005 at 11:50pm. 0 Comments 0 Trackbacks

Tuesday, April 26, 2005

More Homework: An Elegant Matous Study
Among the minimum requirements for success in chess are tactical proficiency and skill in the endgame, and among the components of almost any successful life are the presence of beauty and humor. Happy, then, is the lover of endgame studies, for he or she will have all four needs met at once. Take a look and see for yourself - happy solving!


M. Matous 1982: White to play and win.
Posted by Dennis Monokroussos on Tuesday April 26, 2005 at 7:45pm. 0 Comments 0 Trackbacks

Sunday, April 24, 2005

Rook vs. Bishop: Ending 4 (and then some)
At long last, here is the fourth and final ending in our series on rook vs. bishop endings. The position is a draw and the means very simple, but there are so many extremely interesting near-neighbors to this ending that the post exploded in size and depth, but it was worth it - even if none of you learn anything from this (which would be a great pity), I learned quite a bit! So be patient, follow along, and you'll be surprised at how enjoyable, fascinating, and easy to learn endgames can be.

Anand,Viswanathan (2786) - Van Wely,Loek (2679) [D48]
Amber Rapid Monte Carlo MNC (9), 29.03.2005

1.Nf3 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 d5 4.d4 c6 5.e3 Nbd7 6.Bd3 dxc4 7.Bxc4 b5 8.Bd3 a6 9.e4 c5 10.d5 Bb7 11.0-0 Qc7 12.Bc2 c4 13.Nd4 e5 14.Nf5 g6 15.Ne3 Bc5 16.Qf3 0-0 17.Bd2 Ne8 18.Ne2 Nd6 19.Rfc1 Rac8 20.a4 b4 21.a5 Qd8 22.Ra4 Ba8 23.Bxb4 Bxb4 24.Rxb4 Qxa5 25.Ra4 Qb6 26.Rb1 Bb7 27.h4 Qd8 28.Qg3 Nc5 29.Nc3 Nxa4 30.Bxa4 f6 31.h5 g5 32.h6 Rb8 33.Nf5 Bc8 34.Ng7 Qe7 35.Qf3 f5 36.exf5 Bxf5 37.Re1 Rxb2 38.Qg3 e4 39.f4 Bg6 40.Ne6 gxf4 41.Nxf4 Qa7+ 42.Kh2 Qf2 43.Qxf2 Rxf2 44.Nxg6 hxg6 45.Nxe4 Nxe4 46.Rxe4 R2f4 47.Re7 c3 48.Bc2 R8f7 49.Re3 Kh7 50.Rxc3 R7f6 51.Ra3 Rd4 52.Bd3 a5 53.Bb5 Rxd5 54.Rxa5 Kxh6 55.Ra6 Rxa6 56.Bxa6




This position turns out to be an easy draw: White simply plays g3, keeps the bishop on the h1-a8 diagonal and the king on g1 or g2 and there's nothing Black can do! 56...Kg5 57.g3 Rd6 58.Bc8 Rc6 59.Bd7 Rc7 60.Be6 Kf6 61.Bg4 Ke5 62.Bf3 Rh7+ 63.Kg2 Kd4 64.Ba8 Ke3 65.Bc6 Rc7 66.Ba8 Rc2+ 67.Kg1 Kd4 68.Bb7 Rb2 69.Bc6 Ke5 70.Ba8 Kf5 71.Bf3 Ke5 72.Kf1 Kd4 73.Kg1 Ke3 74.Ba8 Ra2 75.Bb7 Rd2 76.Ba8 Rf2 77.Bb7 Ke2 78.Ba8 Ke3 79.Bb7 g5 80.Ba8 g4 81.Bb7 Ra2 82.Bc6 Rb2 83.Ba8 Kd4 84.Bc6 Rb6



Let's stop for a moment and consider this position. If you're blowing through the moves a la Evelyn Wood, it probably seems uninteresting: White can play Bh1, Bg2, or Ba8 and nothing changes, nothing matters. Not so! If 85.Bg2? Rb1+ 86.Kf2 Rb2+ 87.Kg1 then Rxg2+! wins - the price of having a pawn on the third rank instead of the fourth: 88.Kxg2 Ke3 89.Kg1 Kf3 90.Kh2 Kf2 91.Kh1 Kxg3 92.Kg1 Kh3 93.Kh1 g3 94.Kg1 g2 95.Kf2 Kh2-+ and so on. And 85.Bh1? is the same thing: 85...Rb1+ 86.Kh2 Rxh1+ 87.Kxh1 Ke3 88.Kg2 Ke2 89.Kg1 Kf3 90.Kh2 Kf2 91.Kh1 Kxg3 92.Kg1 Kh3 93.Kh1 g3 94.Kg1 g2 95.Kf2 Kh2-+

What can we learn from this? Lots, actually, if we'll take the time to play around a bit! Suppose we had a 7x8 board: 8 ranks still, but only 7 files. If we moved the pawns over one file, then it looks like Black would win! Of course, the board isn't 7x8, it's 8x8, but what will happen if we move everything over a file anyway? For the answer to this question, take a look at supplementary position 1, below - but try to figure it out for yourself first!

Here's another interesting question: we know that Black wins here if White plays inaccurately on account of the exchanging combination to a winning pawn ending. So let's suppose we move everything up a rank - the pawns are on g4 and g5, so that after the same sort of exchange sac in the variations above the position will be a draw. Does that mean the position is a draw, period, with best play? Again, try to work it out for yourselves, and then consult with supplementary position 2.

Finally, one might wonder why Anand put his pawn on the opposite colored square to his bishop - wouldn't it be more secure on the same-colored square? That leads to two further cases: one with the pawn anchored on g2, the other with the pawn on g4; for the answers, see supplementary positions 3 and 4.

And even returning to the position in the game, there's yet another important question to ask: what about; 85.Bd7 - does this draw? It's not thematic, but if it doesn't lose, then is it important? 85...Rg6 86.Kf2 and Black isn't making any progress here, either.

We now return you to your regularly scheduled game:

85.Ba8 Ke3 86.Kg2 Rd6 87.Bb7 Rd2+ 88.Kg1 Rf2 89.Ba8 Rf3 90.Kg2 Rf2+ 91.Kg1 Ra2 92.Bb7 Ra4 93.Kg2 Kd4 94.Bc6 Rb4 95.Kg1 Kc5 96.Ba8 Rb8



here too, White has only one move: the diagonal is only just long enough for the White bishop. 97.Be4 Kd6 98.Kg2 Rb4 99.Ba8 Ra4 100.Bb7 Kc7 101.Bd5 Rd4 102.Ba8 Ra4 103.Bd5 Kd6 104.Bb7 Ra7 105.Be4 Ke5 106.Bc6 Ra6 107.Bb7 Rb6 108.Ba8 Rb8 109.Bc6 Kd6 110.Be4 Re8 111.Bf5 Rg8 112.Be4 Re8 113.Bf5 Re2+ 114.Kf1 Ra2 115.Bxg4 Ke5 116.Bf3 Kd4 117.Kg1 Ke3 118.Bd5 Rd2 119.Bc6 1/2-1/2


Rook vs Bishop part 4 - Supplement 1



1.Bc7 holds for now, but let's see if we can construct a different sort of net for the bishop. [1.Bf2 Ra1+ 2.Ke2 Ra2+ 3.Kf1 Rxf2+ 4.Kxf2 Kd3 5.Kf1 Ke3 6.Kg2 Ke2 7.Kg1 Kxf3 8.Kf1 Kg3 9.Kg1 f3 10.Kf1 f2 11.Ke2 Kg2-+] 1...Rf6 2.Ke2 Kd4 3.Kd2 Kd5 4.Kd3 Rf8 5.Ke2 Ke6 6.Kd3 Kf5 7.Ke2 Re8+ 8.Kf2 Rc8 9.Bb6 Rc2+ 10.Kf1 Ke5 11.Ba7 Rb2 12.Bc5 Rb5 13.Ba7 Kd5



And we've done it - it's a complete zugzwang! First, clearly enough, the bishop has no moves: it can't transfer to the b8-h2 diagonal, obviously enough, as that would hang the bishop, as would moving it to b6, c6, d4 or e3. 14.Bf2 and 14.Bg1 lose familiarly: Black forces the exchange of his rook for the bishop and wins the pawn ending. That leaves king moves, but it turns out that there aren't any good ones, because none of them stops the threat of 14...Rb7 15.Bf2/Bg1 followed by 2-3 rook moves forcing the winning pawn ending. The best try is 14.Ke2, but now 14...Kc4 renews the dilemma. All bishop moves lose, and all king moves but one allow 15...Rb7 followed by forcing the trade. We're left with only 15.Kd2, but now 15...Rb3



poses the final dilemma. Giving up the f-pawn loses, while 16.Ke2 returns to the lost pawn ending. Let's take a look at both, briefly: 16.Bg1 [16.Ke2 Rb7 17.Bg1 Rb2+ 18.Kf1 Rb1+ 19.Kg2 Rxg1+ 20.Kxg1 Kd3 21.Kg2 Ke2 22.Kg1 Kxf3 23.Kf1 Kg3 24.Kg1 f3 25.Kf1 f2 26.Ke2 Kg2-+] 16...Rxf3 17.Ke2 Rb3 18.Ba7 Kd5 19.Bf2 Ke4 20.Bc5 Rb2+ 21.Kf1



21...Kf3 [It's very important to remember that 21...f3?? leads to a draw: see Rook vs. Bishop: Ending 1 for the details.] 22.Kg1 Rd2 23.Bb6 Rg2+ 24.Kf1 [24.Kh1 Kg3 25.Bc5 f3-+] 24...Rb2 25.Ba5 Rb1+ 26.Be1 Rd1 27.Kg1 Rxe1+ 28.Kh2 Rf1 29.Kh3 Rh1#


Rook vs Bishop, part 4 - Supplement 2



1.Bg3 [1.Bd8 lines will be ignored this time around - we'll assume Black was careful earlier not to allow it. (I certainly recommend that the reader analyze this carefully, however, and try to determine if Black can evict the bishop and bring the king back around without allowing this defensive try a second time.)] 1...Ke4 2.Bd6 Rb6 3.Bc7 Rb2+ 4.Kg3 Rb7 5.Bd6 Kd5



Ironic, isn't it? The bishop's diagonal turns out to be too small here, too! Move everything down a rank and White has 6.Ba8; unfortunately, the way things are White needs 6.Ba9 to stay alive, and that's just not legal. The bishop must leave the diagonal, and sure enough, Black wins: 6.Bf8 Rb3+ 7.Kg2 Ke5 followed by 8...Kf4, 9...Kxg4 and so on, but not 7...Ke4? 8.Bd6 and Black has to start all over again.


Rook vs Bishop part 4 - Supplement 3



The first thing to note is that this is a pretty favorable starting position for Black. For instance, if the Black king were further back, White could put the bishop on the c8-h3 diagonal and his king on the third rank, and then Black would have a dickens of a time trying to make progress. When examining such positions, try out different Black pawn locations as well. Perhaps if the Black king has access to g5, that will undermine White's anti-Kf5 strategy - here Black needs that square, but if he has g5, then he might not! With those caveats - and, I hope, suggestions for tinkering on the part of the reader, let's take a look at this particular position, and see what's available. White to move should play 1.g3, as we know from the main game, but let's see what happens if he tries to keep the pawn on g2. 1.Ke3 Ra3+ 2.Kf2 g4 3.Bc6 Kf4 4.Bd5 Rd3 5.Bc6 Rd2+ 6.Kg1 [6.Ke1 Ke3-+ and the White bishop has nowhere to hide: if it moves to b7 or a8, Black plays Rb2 or Ra2, respectively, threatening both the bishop and a back rank mate.] 6...Kg3 7.Kf1 Rf2+ 8.Kg1 [8.Ke1 Rxg2 9.Kf1 Rc2 10.Ba4 Rf2+ 11.Ke1 (11.Kg1 Ra2) 11...Kg2 12.Bc6+ Kg1 13.Bd5 g3-+] 8...Rc2 9.Bb5 Rc1+ 10.Bf1 Ra1 11.Kh1 Rxf1#


Rook vs Bishop part 4 - Supplement 4



Finally, if the setup with the White pawn on g2 was overly passive, let's see if White fares any better here. Now there won't be any mating nets to worry about, and as we've also already seen, the exchange of the rook for the bishop doesn't lead to an automatic win, either. White's dark squares are seriously weak, obviously enough, but is it fatal? Let's see: 1.Ke4 Re8+ 2.Kd4 [No sense in making it easy for the Black king to get into the White position!] 2...Rb8 3.Kd5 Rb5+ 4.Ke4 Re5+ 5.Kf3 [5.Kd4 loses to 5...Rxf5 6.gxf5 Kxf5 7.Ke3 Kg4 8.Kf2 Kh3 9.Kg1 Kg3-+] 5...Re7 [5...Rxf5+? is only a draw, of course, as the White king is in front of the pawn and can easily maintain the opposition: 6.gxf5 Kxf5 7.Kg3 g4 8.Kg2 Kf4 9.Kf2 g3+ 10.Kg2 Kg4 11.Kg1! (11.Kf1?? Kf3 12.Kg1 g2 13.Kh2 Kf2-+) 11...Kh3 12.Kh1 g2+ 13.Kg1 Kg3 stalemate.] 6.Kf2 Ke5 [The king is in, but there's still a little work to be done.] 7.Kf3 Ra7 8.Kg3 Ra3+ 9.Kg2 Kf4 10.Bc8 Ra2+ Black needs to penetrate further with his king - cashing out with [10...Rg3+ 11.Kh2 Rxg4?? 12.Bxg4 Kxg4 13.Kg2 is a draw (though it wouldn't be one rank down). 13...Kf4 14.Kf2 g4 15.Kg2 g3 the reason why the previously commented-on position was winning a rank down is that if this position were one rank further down, White would have to bring the king to h2 (the equivalent of h3 here), but thanks to the availability of g1 (as opposed to the non-existent g0 in the parallel case), White maintains the draw: 16.Kg1 Kf3 17.Kf1 g2+ 18.Kg1 Kg3=] 11.Kh3 [11.Kf1 Kf3 12.Kg1 Rg2+ 13.Kf1 (13.Kh1 Kg3 and mating threats decide.) 13...Rc2-+ forces White to surrender the pawn, when the win becomes routine (Black slowly advances the pawn, with his king in front, as if heading for the Lucena position).] 11...Kf3 12.Bb7+ Kf2 and now White is threatened with ...Ra7-h7# ideas. 13.Bc6 Ra6 14.Be8



White seems to be okay: 14...Rh6+ 15.Bh5 and so what, right? 14...Kg1! Oops! White gets mated on the third rank instead: 15.Bb5 Ra3+ 16.Bd3 Rxd3#
Posted by Dennis Monokroussos on Sunday April 24, 2005 at 1:30pm. 0 Comments 0 Trackbacks
Rook vs. Bishop: Ending 3
We turn now to the third in our series of rook vs. bishop endings (its predecessors can be found here and here), this one taken from the game Viktor Kortchnoi (a.k.a. Kortchnoi, a.k.a. Kortschnoj)-Boris Spassky, Clermont Ferrand 1989.



Obviously enough, only White can win this (barring massive hallucination, bribe, or heart attack), but it's not exactly clear at first glance how he's going to make progress. White has no safe pawn move, the rook can't do anything by itself and the White king is stalemated.

Is it a draw then? Thanks to the indispensable endgame tool known as zugzwang, it's not.

51.Ra7 First step: activate the rook. Clearly Black doesn't want to retreat the king - at least not if he doesn't have to - so Black's next move is obvious. 51...Be6 52.Rc7 The power of waiting moves! Now Black has to make a significant decision. If he retreats the king, White happily plays Kg5 and works for the f5 break, while if he retreats the bishop, White has two interesting possibilities. First, he could take his king out of the cage, retreat to h3 and then perhaps try to penetrate Black's position by going the long way around:g2-f3-e3-d4-c5-d6-e7 and so on. Even assuming White can do all that without anything bad happening to him (such as useful pawn trades via ...h4 and/or ...g5), it's not enough. White will still need to break the Black pawn structure somewhere to make progress, so he might as well do it with the king on h4. And that leads to possibility number two: the f5 pawn break. 52...Bb3 [52...Kg7 53.Kg5 The Black king can't afford to give up any more ground, but it's already too much: White will maneuver the rook to f6, play f5, and win the pawn ending by taking advantage of Black's fractured pawn structure. 53...Bg4 54.Rc6 Bh3 55.Rf6 Bg4 (55...Bd7 56.f5 Bxf5 57.Rxf5 gxf5 58.Kxh5! comes to the same thing.) 56.f5 gxf5 (56...Bxf5 57.Rxf5 gxf5 58.Kxh5! (But not 58.Kxf5?? Kf8! 59.Kg5 Ke7 60.Kxh5 Ke6 with a draw.) 58...Kf8 59.Kg5 Ke8! 60.Kf6! Kf8 61.e6 with a routine win.) 57.Ra6 followed by Ra7 wins - the subsequent threat of e6 can only be averted by allowing the lethal Kf6 or by pitching the f5 and h5 pawns.] 53.f5! gxf5



Now that the Black pawn structure has been destroyed, it's time to start collecting the weakies. To do so, White maneuvers the rook to g5, when either the h5 or f5 pawn will fall. (Unless Black plays 54...Bd1, in which case 55.Rc6+ followed by 56.Kg5 and 57.Rc7, with the threat of 58.e6, will do the trick.) 54.Rc8 Be6 55.Rd8 Kg6 56.Rg8+ Kh7 57.Rg5 Kh6 58.Rxh5+ Kg6



Now it's time for another stage in the plan. However, the first thing we should do is extricate the rook, as White can't do anything as long as the rook is so clumsily placed. 59.Rh8 Kg7 60.Re8 Kg6



Okay, the rook's position has been improved; now what? 61.g4 is senseless, there aren't any inspiring room maneuvers on the horizon, so let's improve the position of the king. 61.Kh3! Bd5 [61...f4+



is a much more interesting move. I'm sure "Viktor the Terrible" would have won just the same, but there are a couple of neat traps. The more obvious but still seductive false trail is the liquidating 62.Rxe6+?? fxe6 63.gxf4 and now Kh7!! (and only Kh7!!) draws, maintaining the distant opposition: a) 63...Kf5 64.Kg3 Kg6 65.Kg4 Kh6 (65...Kf7 66.Kh5 Kg7 67.Kg5 Kf7 68.Kh6 Kf8 69.Kg6 Ke7 70.Kg7 Ke8 71.Kf6 Kd7 72.Kf7+-) 66.f5 exf5+ 67.Kxf5 Kg7 68.Ke6 Kf8 69.Kd7+-; b) 63...Kh5 64.Kg3 Kh6 65.Kh4 Kg6 66.Kg4 Kf7 (66...Kh6 67.f5+- see line a) 67.Kh5 Kg7 68.Kg5 Kf7 69.Kh6 Ke8 70.Kg6 Ke7 71.Kg7 Ke8 72.Kf6 Kd7 73.Kf7+-; ]

So the correct move is 62.g4, but there is another trick yet to come: 62...Kg5 63.Rg8+ Kh6 64.Kh4 Bc4 65.Rd8 f3 66.Rd6+ Kg7 67.Kg3 Be2 68.Rf6 Bd1 and now a) 69.Rxf3?? looks like a routine win, but amazingly, it's not! 69...Bxf3 70.Kxf3 Kh6!!



The only drawing move! (70...Kg6 71.Kf4 Kh6 72.Kf5 Kg7 73.Kg5 Kg8 74.Kf6 Kf8 75.g5 Ke8 76.Kg7 Ke7 77.Kg8 Ke8 78.e6 fxe6 79.g6 Ke7 80.Kh7 e5 81.g7+-; 70...Kh7 71.Ke4 Kg6 72.Kf4 - see 70...Kg6 71.Kf4) ; b) 69.Kh3 is the start of a rather subtle winning idea: 69...Be2 70.g5 Bd1 71.Kh4 Be2 72.g6! fxg6 73.Kg5 Bd1 74.e6 Bb3 75.e7 Bf7 76.Rxf3 Kg8 77.Kh6 g5 78.Rf5 g4 79.Rg5+ Kh8 80.Rxg4 Be8 81.Rf4 Bf7 82.Rxf7 Kg8 83.Rf8#; The most natural winning plan is c) 69.g5 Be2 70.Kf2 Bd1 71.Ke3 Be2 72.Kd4 Bd1 73.Kc5 Be2 74.Kd6 Bd1 75.Ke7 Be2 76.Rxf7+ Kg6 77.e6 Kxg5 78.Kd6 Kg4 79.Kc5! Bd1 80.Kb4! with an elegant win. And now, back to the mundane conclusion:

62.Rg8+ [62.Rg8+ Kh7 63.Rd8 Be6 64.Kg2 Kg6 65.Kf3 Kg5 66.Rg8+ Kh6 67.Kf4 followed by 68.Rg5 and 69.Rxf5, winning easily.] 1-0
Posted by Dennis Monokroussos on Sunday April 24, 2005 at 5:00am. 0 Comments 0 Trackbacks

Saturday, April 23, 2005

Rook vs. Bishop: Ending 2
It's time to resume our brief series of rook vs. bishop endings (see here and here), and this one's a real doozy. We started with this easy-looking position:



and the task was to determine how White is supposed to win.

It does look easy: all we need is get the rook to the back rank and it's mate! Black can use stalemate tricks, sure, but if we put the king on h6 and the rook on the 7th to protect the pawn (if we have to), what resources could Black have then? So let's try it:

Attempt 1:

1.Kh6 Be4!

Hitting the h7 pawn forces White to play 2.Ra7, because the pure rook vs. bishop ending is generally a trivial draw when the king is in a corner of the opposite color of his bishop.

2.Ra7

and now, the key move:

2...Bb7!!



This move isn't terrific because it's showy; its strength comes from its preventing White from repositioning the rook on a different file. It's also the only move: 2...Bc6? 3.Rf7; 2...Bd5? 3.Rd7, etc.

3.Kg6

There's no other way to attempt progress: if the rook retreats, the bishop simply returns to e4.

3...Be4+ 4.Kf7 Kxh7=

J. Vancura, the composer of this 1924 study, gave the unnecessarily fancy but also more thematic 4...Bg6+ 5.Kf6 Bxh7 6.Ra8+ Bg8= as the continuation. It works too! And either way, 1.Kh6 fails to win - but then how could White have any winning ideas here at all?

A first clue comes if we consider the position after 1.Kh6? Be4! 2.Ra7 Bb7!! Since it's a mutual zugzwang, White's win, if it's possible, will involve some tempo-gaining maneuver. White needs to get the rook off the a-file, for starters, and to do so without dropping the h-pawn. He can't move the rook yet, though, because of 1...Be4+, either winning the pawn or leading to stalemate, so by process of elimination, we get this:

Attempt 2:

1.Kg5!!

It's not at all clear how this wins, but it's at least certain that it doesn't hurt anything, as the obvious/familiar Black tries 1...Kxh7, 1...Be4 and 1...Kg7 lose to 2.Rh4+, 2.Rxe4 and 2.h8(Q)+ Kxh8 3.Rh4+ and 4.Rxh1, respectively.

Turning to subtler lines, carefree bishop moves demonstrate the winning procedure. Thus

(A) 1...Bc6 2.Rc4 Bb5 3.Rc7 Bd3 4.Kh6 Bf5 5.Rf7 wins.
(B) 1...Bd5 2.Rd4 Bc6 3.Kh6 Be8 4.Rd6 (zugzwang) Bd7 5.Rf6 wins.
(C) 1...Bb7 2.Rb4 Ba6 3.Kh6 Bc8 4.Rb6 Bb7 5.Rd6 wins.

In each case, White is able to win by improving the position of the rook, and that becomes possible by attacking the conveniently relocated bishop. So Black's best try involves playing hide and seek with the bishop:

(D) 1...Bg2

Now what? Attacking the bishop on the g-file, in correspondence to the method of lines A-C, appears pointless, while 2.Kg6 Be4+ and 3...Bxh7 or 2.Kh6 Be4 3.Ra7 Bb7 both draw. Worse news still: if the rook leaves the fourth rank, then 2...Be4 wins the h-pawn, drawing.

Thus, even though it looks pointless, we see by process of elimination that White's only attempt is

2.Rg4!



Fortunately, it's also a good move! Black now has two options: to return the bishop to the h-file or not.

(i) 2...Bh3 3.Re4! (Taking advantage of Black's inability to capture on h7 when 4.Rh4+ would pick up the bishop) Bd7 4.Kh6 Be6 5.Rb4 Bc8 6.Rb6 (zugzwang) Bb7 7.Rd6 wins.

(ii) 2...Bc6 3.Kh6 Bd5 4.Rd4 wins.



Subtle? Yes. Difficult? Quite - but not impossible. But it's also elegant and instructive, and though the path to improvement comes not so much from mastering particular positions like this (though it's a component of one's skill), it does come (a) from the chess-specific cognitive development and (b) the feeling for the pieces one acquires by attempting to solve such positions. So if you haven't done so yet, give positions 3 and 4 a try before I present their solutions. It's worth it!
Posted by Dennis Monokroussos on Saturday April 23, 2005 at 9:55pm. 0 Comments 0 Trackbacks
Rook vs. Bishop: Ending 1
Several days ago, I presented a series of four rook vs. bishop endings with the promise of forthcoming solutions. Here again is the first position:



The task was left unstated: White to move and...? One might reasonably wonder if White can win this, given Black's two passed pawns, but in fact he can. All he has to do is avoid the move actually played in the game Hanken-Fries, USA 2004:

60.f6+?

This seems logical, but it's actually very bad - Black can now draw even without his pawns! As Pal Benko explains in his "Endgame Lab" column in the March 2005 Chess Life (page 46), "All we have to do is chase away the king with check when it steps either to e6 or g6. In case the pawn is pushed to f7, we have to play either Ke7 or Kg7 [DM: which square is appropriate depends on the location of the White king - Black doesn't want to allow the White king to protect the pawn] and take the pawn only afterwards. Therefore White needs the f6-square for his king to win..."

Therefore, White should have played 60.Rg6+ Kf7 61.Rh6 Be2 62.Rh7+ Kg8 63.Rd7 h4 64.Kf6 h3 65.Kg6 and wins (Benko).

60...Kg6?

Of course, given what we know from the Benko quote, 60...Kf8 led to a simple draw. Now the Black king gets cut off from the f-pawn, so White's winning chances rise dramatically, though by sacrificing the h-pawn (in order to return the Black king to its proper defensive post on the f-file) the draw is still available. Nevertheless, since Black rejected that idea when it didn't cost anything, it's unlikely he'll reconsider at the cost of a pawn.

61.Rb7 h4 62.Rg7+ Kh6 63.Rg4 Bf7?

63...Kh5? lost to 64.Rxc4 (64...bxc4 65.f7), but Benko rightly notes that 63...h3! draws, as 64.Rh4+ Kg6 65.Rxh3 Kf7 allows the king to return to his roost.

64.Rxh4+ Kg6 65.Rf4??

A blunder, and we all know why at this point: it allows the Black king to return to f7! 65.Rg4+ followed by 66.Rg7 was a very easy win, but some days, nothing seems to go right.

65...Bc4

Vacating f7 for the king, right?

66.Kd6 Bb3??

Wrong. Even with the threat of 67.Ke7 hanging over his head, when the pawn clearly queens or costs Black the bishop, Black STILL avoids ...Kf7.

67.Ke7 1-0


It's easy for us to look at this and feel superior, feel Schadenfreude, wonder how they could be so slow, etc. Even Benko expresses his exasperation, asking rhetorically after Black's 66th move "Does Black want to lose?" Really though, there's just one relevant idea, and neither player got it. White didn't fear the Black king's reaching f7/f8, and Black had no interest in its reaching those squares. Presumably both thought the king would be in a mating net if it became stuck on the back rank, but neither realized that without the White king's safely reaching e6 or g6, there's no mate to be had. Thus, since Black (with correct play) can check the White king away the instant he reaches either of those squares, the Black king is safe.

So let's be smart and learn from others' mistakes: the strong side is typically best off with his king leading the pawn, as that facilitates the crucial process of driving the defender away from the queening square. The goal is to cut the defender off from the queening file (or in some cases, to cut it off from the pawn horizontally, though that's rarer).

Conversely, the defender wants to stay in front of the pawn and to prevent (if possible) the strong side's king from getting in front of the passer. In such cases, the position is rather like an opposite colored bishop ending: the defensive side has a very strong grip on the squares of one color, and despite the strong side's superior firepower, it's basically impotent to break the blockade: the pawn covers the wrong-colored squares, and when the king tries to help fight for that color complex (light squares in our case), he gets checked off immediately.

This is useful, but we can learn even more by playing around with the position (without the Black pawns, perhaps - at least at first). Try moving everything over a file or two either way, or down a couple of ranks. Will it make a difference? Which side, if any, benefits from the changes? Are certain pawns harder for one side to handle?

Further, we can reflect on what we've learned here for more complicated positions. We can see that the rook is relatively impotent to break the blockade by itself, and can perhaps start to think about the implications of exchange sacrifices in positions where the bishop's side has nearly full control over one color complex and not too many worries about squares of the opposite color. And how much leeway does it provide? One way to proceed is by adding pawns for each side. If the result with the new material is a draw, then add a pawn to White, or at least a further pair of pawns for each side. If the result, on the other hand, is a loss for the bishop's side, give him another pawn.

By playing around like that (remember the Cycle World post?), you'll learn something about rooks and bishops. It won't be some sort of dull theoretical ending you're trying to learn from a book (not that there's anything wrong with that!), but something fun, something you'll have taught yourself. Better yet, it won't be some sort of isolated chess factoid, but a case of genuine know-how with applications extending well beyond the initial exercise.

As they used to say when I was a kid: Try it, you'll like it!
Posted by Dennis Monokroussos on Saturday April 23, 2005 at 4:45pm. 0 Comments 0 Trackbacks

Monday, April 18, 2005

Rook vs. Bishop: 4 Endings
In my own practice, I haven't seen many rook vs. bishop endings, and I suspect the same is true for many of you, too. Nevertheless, if we want to be well-rounded in our chess education, it's worth spending some time every now and then even on relatively uncommon endings, if they are fundamental. So here are four rook vs. bishop endgame positions; your mission, if you choose to accept it - and I hope you will - is to do your best to solve the positions before I present the solutions over the course of the next few days.

Position 1: White to move and ___, and how?



Position 2: White to move and win - how?



Position 3: White to move and win - how?



Position 4: Win or draw?

Posted by Dennis Monokroussos on Monday April 18, 2005 at 12:05am. 0 Comments 0 Trackbacks