The Chess Mind

By Dennis Monokroussos.
This is a blog for chess fans by a chess fan, one who loves the beauty of the game and wants to share it with those who are like-minded.
Yet the chess mind is not only a chess mind, and other topics, such as philosophy, may appear from time to time. All material copyrighted.
The Dread Pirate Kramnik?

Dread Pirate Roberts: All right: where is the poison? The battle of wits has begun. It ends when you decide and we both drink, and find out who is right and who is dead.

Vizzini: But it's so simple. All I have to do is divine from what I know of you. Are you the sort of man who would put the poison into his own goblet, or his enemy's? Now, a clever man would put the poison into his own goblet, because he would know that only a great fool would reach for what he was given. I'm not a great fool, so I can clearly not choose the wine in front of you. But you must have known I was not a great fool; you would have counted on it, so I can clearly not choose the wine in front of me.

Dread Pirate Roberts: You've made your decision then?

Vizzini: Not remotely. Because iocane comes from Australia, as everyone knows. And Australia is entirely peopled with criminals. And criminals are used to having people not trust them, as you are not trusted by me. So I can clearly not choose the wine in front of you.

Dread Pirate Roberts: Truly, you have a dizzying intellect.

Vizzini: Wait till I get going! Where was I?

And as everyone who has seen the wonderful little movie "The Princess Bride" knows, Vizzini continues in his attempt to out-think the Dread Pirate Roberts. You may surmise, even if you have not seen the movie, that his attempt is not a rousing success.

Now to chess. According to Chess Today (issue 2091), Kramnik's manager, Karsten Hansel, has stated that at Dortmund Kramnik will not show any of the novelties he has prepared for the Topalov match.

Now why would he say such a thing? Let's say it's true. Wouldn't Kramnik want Topalov to waste his time carefully examining his Dortmund openings? Surely he doesn't gain anything by reducing Topalov's workload!

Hmm...wait a minute: maybe Kramnik is going to use his Dortmund openings, and Hansel's statement is designed to throw Topalov off track by getting him to disregard those openings! But maybe that's too quick. It's not that Kramnik wouldn't play those openings, but just that he wouldn't show his novelties. Still, Kramnik wouldn't reveal his preferred openings, and help Topalov know where to look in his preparations, would he? So Topalov can disregard these openings after all...unless this is another red herring.

Looks like Topalov should just ignore the Hansel/Kramnik gambit and just prepare normally - after all, there might be iocane powder in both cups.

Posted by Dennis Monokroussos on Monday July 31, 2006 at 1:52am
DandyDanD (mail) (www):
Of course ignoring such "advice" from the opponent is the best solution. Nevertheless, I truly enjoyed this scene from the movie (the only scene I've seen) as well as this post. And remember, never go in against a Sicilian when death is on the line! :-)
7.31.2006 12:12pm
inky (mail):
And maybe Kramnik will not show any of the novelties he has prepared for the Topalov match because there will not be a match?!
7.31.2006 12:40pm
Joshua Gutman (mail) (www):
Great analogy, I truly enjoyed it. I have a possible "other" theory for this statement: Preventing what I call "The Shirov Disaster". If he specifically says this isn't his top preparation then even if he has a bad result people can expect much better of him preventing the sponsors from pulling out of the match due to lack of interest. This all being part of a huge admission that the only reason he ever got a shot at the title is by someone else having a bad result entirely independent of the qualification process.
7.31.2006 2:10pm
wgh:
Incontheivable!!
8.1.2006 10:25am
RoughKnight (mail):
Great analogy indeed - and most amusing. Suppose Kramnik will be playing left-handed? As to wgh's 'Incontheivable' - "I don't it means what you think it means!"
8.1.2006 2:02pm
A:
Kramnik (and I don't think his manager would say that without consulting him) said a similar thing a few years ago : That Dortmund (or maybe it was another tournament)
isn't really important, and the only thing important
is the world championship.

He doesn't seem to realize that this is disrespectful
to both
- his opponents (They would of course have lost, had
only Kramnik used his dreaded novelties)
- the organizers of the tournament (ok, here Kramniks
manager would be included himself)

It's reasonable to spare novelties, but to talk about this
is not very nice.

Enough raving.
8.1.2006 4:35pm