The Chess Mind

By Dennis Monokroussos.
This is a blog for chess fans by a chess fan, one who loves the beauty of the game and wants to share it with those who are like-minded.
Yet the chess mind is not only a chess mind, and other topics, such as philosophy, may appear from time to time. All material copyrighted.
The World Championship: What's Next?
As I understand it, there are four bits of information to pass along:

1. The Topalov-Radjabov world championship match scheduled for 2007 is off: as far as I'm aware, this match is now off for both parties.

2. Rematch? Have a look here. According to Danailov, "FIDE regulations allow every world champion that has lost the title to challenge the title holder." Danailov proposes a start date of March 3, 2007 in Sofia, Bulgaria. It will be very interesting to see what comes of this.

3. Candidates Matches: These are on for Elista in April of 2007. Pairings for the first round of matches (assuming they don't switch to a tournament format) are Levon Aronian-Magnus Carlsen, Peter Leko-Mikhail Gurevich, Ruslan Ponomariov-Sergey Rublevsky, Boris Gelfand-Rustam Kasimdzhanov, Etienne Bacrot-Gata Kamsky, Alexander Grischuk-Vladimir Malakhov, Judit Polgar-Evgeny Bareev, and Alexei Shirov-Michael Adams. The final four from this event make it on to...

4. The World Championships in Mexico City. The four surviving candidates meet the top 4 from San Luis: Kramnik (replacing Topalov), Viswanathan Anand, Peter Svidler and Alexander Morozevich. At this point, Topalov (or Kramnik, should the match occur when Danailov wants it to and Topalov wins) is out. This is scheduled to occur to begin September 12, 2007.
Posted by Dennis Monokroussos on Sunday October 15, 2006 at 6:03pm
Chuckles:
I suppose it's too much to hope that the Mexico City tournament could be turned into a candidates tourney for the right to face Kramnik in a match. It would solve the problem of Topa being out of the WC while being so highly rated, and would preserve the WC match tradition.

I'm not holding my breath :)
10.15.2006 6:28pm
Perseus (mail):
From one mess to the next? Looks like a recipe for disaster if you ask me.
10.16.2006 9:18am
StevenC (mail):
I am glad that Kramnik was able to pull out the championship win. That was certainly good for chess. I love Topalov's style of play, as well as Kramnik's solid game. They are both great players, at the top of chess. I cannot understand how any 2007 championship scenario could possibly leave either player out, creating further controversy and a disputed champion.
10.16.2006 9:44am
Joe McCarron:
I will be really ticked off if Kramnik puts this title up in a stupid tournament. (mexico 2007) I think he would be crazy to do anything other than say "I have had enough of FIDE."

Now is the time to see if he can't work through the acp and get a decent candidates *match* cycle that culminates in a WC *match* going. FIDE has no binding agreements with anyone since they have already breached what they originally set forth.

Kramnik had private sponsorship for his match with Topalov. (more than what they ultimately agreed to) FIDE was not *required* to be involved. Now Kramnik has Topalovs title so there shouldn't be an issue with moeny. Finally we will get private sponsorship. Now is the time to do this or there will never be another chance to save the title from FIDE's tournaments championship.

I'm glad the title is unified but I see no reason to continue to associate with Kirsan and company. In fact, I think it would be a terrible mistake to continue down that path!
10.16.2006 12:04pm
Perseus (mail):
If once you start down the dark path, forever will it dominate your destiny...
10.16.2006 7:50pm
acirce (mail):
Radjabov had only negotiated a match with Topalov, but he has already said that now he will challenge Kramnik.

And he apparently already has the money. Why wouldn't they want to sponsor Radjabov-Kramnik if they did want to sponsor Radjabov-Topalov?

Danailov has only said that they will find the money although I surely think they are able to. But it seems Radjabov is "first in line." Of course, the FIDE regulations don't seem to say what happens if there are several challenges.
10.16.2006 7:53pm