The Chess Mind

By Dennis Monokroussos.
This is a blog for chess fans by a chess fan, one who loves the beauty of the game and wants to share it with those who are like-minded.
Yet the chess mind is not only a chess mind, and other topics, such as philosophy, may appear from time to time. All material copyrighted.
MTel Masters, Round 3
Today's round was rather funny. Ivanchuk defeated Bu Xiangzhi easily, as a series of bad moves (which formed a single idea, so perhaps we can award a shared '??' to the series as a whole) left Bu with a totally lost game after White's 9th(!!) move. Objectively, the young Chinese star could have resigned at that point, but no one wants to lose such a ridiculously short game. So, after 46 minutes thought, he continued, but although he lasted to move 32 his position was never anything but completely lost.

That kept Ivanchuk perfect at 3/3. In clear second with 2/3 is Topalov, who showed good judgment against Cheparinov, his regular assistant. Topalov got a fair-to-lousy position against Ivanchuk's Classical French yesterday, which suggested that Team Topalov's prep in that variation was somewhat lacking. Accordingly, Topalov chose the Black side of that opening today, and Cheparinov too avoided the normal 8.Qd2. Yesterday Topalov played 8.a3 and got nothing; today, Cheparinov chose the even more unusual 8.Ne2 and also got nothing. On the other hand, he wasn't worse, and on move 26 he could and should have forced a draw with 26.Bc5. Failing to do so, he was objectively lost, and despite a move repetition a few moves later Topalov pretty confidently reeled in the full point.

The third game, Radjabov-Aronian, was drawn. Their game was the ever-popular Anti-Moscow Gambit, and although Radjabov achieved a threatening-looking position, it's not obvious that there was ever anything concrete. After a flurry of exchanges, the players reached a dead drawn ending after 37 moves, and 19 moves later they reached the deadest of all drawn endings: K vs. K.

Standings after Round 3:

1. Ivanchuk 3
2. Topalov 2
3. Cheparinov 1.5
4-5. Aronian, Radjabov 1
6. Bu Xiangzhi .5

Pairings for Round 4:

Radjabov - Topalov
Ivanchuk - Cheparinov
Bu Xiangzhi - Aronian

Tournament site here, video reports here, games with my comments here.
Posted by Dennis Monokroussos on Saturday May 10, 2008 at 9:20pm
inky (mail):
Yesterday Anon said: "Wow, Inky's hatin' on the Top!"‎
_______________________________

No hate involved, Anon. It just seemed to me that Cheparinov is ‎primed (and I still think he will be at the top). ‎

Even though Mr T beat Cheparinov today, they will play again and it ‎might be a different story.‎

Dennis, thanks for keeping us up to date on the games.‎
5.10.2008 11:41pm
AB:
I am quite surprised-shocked and confused and frustrated from the inconsistency in the performance of these Super-Grandmasters. After Amber I was sure Aronian is ruling. That was after Ivanchuk disappointed me since he did not excel in a couple of tournaments. Now in Sofia, Ivanchuk is banging everybody and is playing like a World champion, while Aronian is so pale, so lacking in zest! I am simply stopping to count on my ability to predict results of tournaments. Another example is Kamsky who preformed not well in Baku Grand Prix. While before the GP he built a reputation of being unbeatable. About Topalov I need not add a word. His fluctuations are notorious. I am afraid to say a word about the big K in this blog but.. I can add him to the list as well.

In short If I tended to think a week ago, that Kamsky is going to be the protagonist the match with Topalov , now I know nothing. Anything can happen and there are at least 5 players that have the strength of a World champion. And who the next WC is going to be is an enigma.
5.11.2008 12:58am
Polo :
We are back to the eras of First among Equals.
5.11.2008 4:53pm