The Chess Mind

By Dennis Monokroussos.
This is a blog for chess fans by a chess fan, one who loves the beauty of the game and wants to share it with those who are like-minded.
Yet the chess mind is not only a chess mind, and other topics, such as philosophy, may appear from time to time. All material copyrighted.
Mini-review: 100 Endgames You Must Know
That's a slightly funny title for a slightly funny book, yet this effort by GM Jesus de la Villa may be worth your while. Allow me to briefly explain the humor, after which I'll summarize and evaluate the book. What's funny about the title is its vagueness. Maybe he's right that we must know these 100 endgames, but are they the 100 endings we must know, or are there more? (Can you say "sequel"?) Also funny, in the sense of being peculiar, is the ordering of the book's material. After a chapter on basic endings and a sort of pre-test, his first "real" chapter covers knight vs. pawn, while king and pawn endings (aside from the most trivial cases) are addressed only in chapter 12!

Despite the slightly strange - or perhaps only unusual - arrangement of material, there is much to commend in this book. First, the material selected does belong, and includes fare sometimes skipped in introductory texts. (His coverage of various rook and two pawns vs. rook endings is a useful example.) Second, he presents the information by multiple means: specific variations, verbal explanations, rules (he calls them "conclusions") and diagrams with various markings (numbered squares, stars of various shapes, etc.). This is an excellent way to help the reader really get the information and remember it - or at least increases the likelihood that learning will take place. Occasionally he offers tangential exercises for the reader (without solutions, which in the context of the challenges is actually a good thing), and the pre- and post-tests are also pedagogically useful.

So I think he has done a good job in presenting the material. But what is the material? Here are the chapter headings:

1. Basic endings (covers some elementary k+p vs. k endings, as well as some very simple, pawnless, rook vs. bishop and rook vs. knight endings)
2. Basic Test (this is essentially a pre-test for the whole book, not a review of chapter 1)
3. Knight vs. Pawn
4. Queen vs. Pawn
5. Rook vs. Pawn
6. Rook vs. 2 Pawns
7. Same-coloured bishops: Bishop + Pawn vs. Bishop
8. Bishop vs. Knight: one pawn on the board
9. Opposite-coloured bishops: Bishop + 2 pawns vs. Bishop
10. Rook + Pawn vs. Rook
11. Rook + two Pawns vs. Rook
12. Pawn endings
13. Other material relations (this one's a real grab bag, including but not exhausted by KBNk, KRBkr, and KQkrp)
14. Final Test

The ordering is non-traditional, and it's interesting that there's no section on N + P vs. N or on Q+P vs. Q. True, such endings arise rarely, but when was the last time you had queen vs. rook and pawn? I've never had it in a serious game, and I doubt I've had it occur more than five or six times in the tens of thousands of blitz games I've played in my life. Overall though, it's a very good presentation of many, maybe most of the fundamental, building-block endings that all tournament players ought to know.

The book isn't a substitute for works like Müller & Lamprecht's Fundamental Chess Endings or Dvoretsky's Endgame Manual, but it's worthwhile for what it does do. Recommended, especially to players in the 1400-2000 range.

A portion of de la Villa's Introduction can be read here (in pdf), and the book is available for purchase here.
Posted by Dennis Monokroussos on Sunday July 6, 2008 at 1:04am
AB:
This is a book I feel I need.
Dennis,
Thank you for this wonderful review.

However I do want to ask a question about chess books, and its a rather earthly one. How can I purchase 2nd hand chess books to reduce the price? One important fact that I have to add is that I live outside the 2 main chess continents, those being, Europe and The United States.

Best wishes
A. Weiler
7.6.2008 4:32am
Diervf (mail):
I thought this book was horrible.
7.6.2008 11:50am
sbb1cpa (mail):
This question is perhaps past what you would prefer to address but how is it in comparison to Silman's Endgame course? Are they redundant, or can you have to many endgame books?

SBB
7.6.2008 5:28pm
Dennis Monokroussos:
AB: It's not a bad question, but unsurprisingly I'm not terribly knowledgeable about booksellers outside the two main chess continents. My suggestion would be to consult with your local club and/or national federation.

Diervf: Any particular reason why?

sbb1cpa: There's some redundancy, as fundamental endings are just that. From what I've gathered from your comments over the years, you're probably fine with Silman's book for now. I think that while 1400s can benefit from 100 Endgames You Must Know, Silman's more "talky" style is probably more beneficial to class C players. At the end of the day, I think someone who goes through the de la Villa book in full will be in better shape than the Silman reader, but for entry level endgame students Silman is probably the better place to start.

All: Here's another (positive) review of the de la Villa book that's also informative. (It's the third entry on the page.)
7.6.2008 10:43pm
sbb1cpa (mail):
Thanks. I am almost finished with Silman's book and was wondering if I should try it. I have Dvortetsky's book (v1) and I have studied parts of it (though much of it is over my head). Silman's is about my level and some of what I studied helped me thursday at Books a Million. I had two rook engames in a row. One was 2 pawns vs 3, but he blundered and I won. The other I had two outside connected passed pawns and it wasn't very hard. I have reviewed them a couple of times and am trying to work through your endgame from Chessvideos.tv, so my brain should be somewhat fertile for the second half presentation.
7.7.2008 1:10pm