The Chess Mind

Author: Dennis Monokroussos.
This is a blog for chess fans by a chess fan who is more than a chess fan - other topics do creep in from time to time, per my interest.
All material here is copyrighted, and may not be reproduced without my prior permission.
Great moments in chess history, telephone edition
This has already happened far too many times, but it doesn't mean that everyone has learned their lesson. A few days ago at the Russian Higher League Championship, Vladimir Malakhov lost a won or nearly won position when his cell phone rang, but yesterday saw a new twist on the phone forfeit situation.

Until a few months ago, I was under the impression that this rule was in effect as an anti-cheating measure, but when I asked an arbiter about this I discovered that I was wrong. The arbiter told us to turn our cell phones off or to vibrate, and when I asked about this discovered that the real point of the rule was to avoid distracting noises.

With that in mind, Nigel Short's sad plight makes more sense. Like Malakhov, he too had a cell phone problem, but unlike Malakhov he wasn't receiving a call (or a text message or whatever else one can receive from the latest crop of cell phones/PDAs/mini-computers). Enjoying a slightly better position against Ketevan Arakhamia Grant in something called the European Union Championships (not to be confused with the [stronger] European Individual Championship), his phone went off to "helpfully" indicate a low battery! It's not that he could have received any useful information about his game in this way, but it was a distraction, and so Short accepted the loss without complaint. Worse still, Short was sure he had turned it off; if so, then if this sort of feature is going to be universal to new phones, then we're all in trouble.
Posted by Dennis Monokroussos on Thursday September 11, 2008 at 6:12pm
Gearoid (mail):
10 years ago mobile phones were the exception rather than the rule and life went on. Is it not possible to leave the damm things in the car or at home. Trust me the world will not end if we do not have one available for a few hours.
9.12.2008 7:12am
Nick Funnell (mail):
Instant forfeiting of the game no matter what the overall circumstances seems a bit draconian to me. Have there been any other rule suggestions made in this area by FIDE/tournament organisers?
9.12.2008 7:47am
Nick Funnell (mail):
On a lighter note, I love the picture of the local regional governor that your Russian championship link takes you to. Could that guy look more like a bit player from The Sopranos if he tried?
9.12.2008 7:51am
Quandary:
If it's only an anti-noise measure (I too thought it was to curb possible cheating), that seems like a REALLY harsh penalty. It sure seems like the only way to protect yourself is to not have the phone on your person.
9.12.2008 7:23pm
guest:
I'm sure (not really but is seems extremely plausible to me) smartphones (onto which you can install any custom made software) can be rigged to send moves (by morse code or something) using the vibration function so that an accomplice following the games over the internet could send computer moves. (sorry for the brackets)
9.12.2008 7:34pm
Enpassant:
I deal with Smartphones all the time (I have one too). There is not one phone that I know of that indicates low battery when turned off.

The main problem with the so called Smartphones are, some of them can only be put in standby mode, they never fully shutdown unless you take the battery out.
9.13.2008 1:19am