Why? There are plenty of reasons for this, some of which are more easily overcome than others. The most fundamental obstacle is in fact our ally, used properly: we are designed to operate out of habit. If we weren't, our lives would be nightmarishly difficult. We wouldn't be able to walk or tie our shoes without concentrated effort if it weren't for our ability to turn conscious physical and mental work into unconscious and effortless activity. The problem is that our capacity for forming habits is indiscriminate; that is to say, it works with whatever repeated thoughts or behavior we feed it. If you get "addicted" to exercise, then exercising will feel natural and not exercising will leave you feeling awful. If you eat good food, then a trip to a fast food restaurant will leave you feeling nauseous; if you regularly eat at such establishments, on the other hand, then that's what your body will learn to crave. Thus habits, once formed, are hard to break, which can be good or bad. It's bad if you're trying to quit smoking, but good when it comes to the overwhelming majority of our day's actions (washing, walking, getting dressed, driving from point A to point B).
It's both good and bad for our chess, too. It would be horrible if we had to go through some sort of ridiculous checklist before every move. ("Am I in check? Is my opponent in check? Are any of my pieces threatened or threatening anything? Is he threatening checkmate? Do I control any open files with my rooks? Can I double my opponent's pawns? Do I have more mobility?" And so on, ad nauseam.) Most of the time, for an experienced player, this is all understood more or less automatically over the course of the game. If we've developed certain misunderstandings about the game, though, we'll carry them around like baggage too, and they're not so helpful.
OK, back to impediments. The first was the basic nature of the habit-forming process. Second, our resolutions tend to stay at the level of wishes. What's necessary, if we want to give non-trivial changes their best chance to succeed, is to form a plan for implementing the change. For example, let's say your goal is to gain 100 rating points this next year. If you're not new to the game and not a kid, that's not so easy, so it's a very good goal: ambitious but not insane. Given that sort of goal, what should you do?
The first thing you should do, of course, is hire me for lessons. (That didn't really need to be said, did it? Well, maybe it did. Moving on...) Half-jokes aside, what you should do is to break it up into subgoals. You might want to break that up into quarterly subgoals - say, to gain 25 points every three months, or if you think that getting back up to speed the first couple of months is necessary, then stagger it a bit. Maybe you'll try to gain 10 points by April, 40 by July, 70 by September and 100 by year's end.
Next, you need means to implement these goals. What are you going to do to make it happen? How much time can you reasonably set aside to study? If you want to gain 100 points but can't spend more than an hour a week studying, it's not going to happen (unless you're starting off with a very low rating). Let's say you have enough time and have the chance to play in tournaments on a regular basis. What's your study plan? Here it's crucial to choose well, as there's no sense spending a lot of time on activities that aren't going to benefit you very much. (A couple of hours of online 1 0 and 3 0 every day will do very little for your chess, sorry.) Making a concrete plan to implement the goal is necessary, otherwise it's only a daydream, an idle wish.
It's easy to get motivated this time of year, but what will you do when the motivation flags? You play in a tournament and lose 20 points, or you get sick for a week and break your training schedule, etc. Something happens, and you're out of your zone. What then? You can always wait until New Year's eve/day 2010, but life will race by if we keep waiting until next year. So think about that, too. One way to help yourself stay on track is by getting a training partner, optimally someone who's pretty close to your own strength. Sure, it means you'll have a tougher time preparing to play him at the next local tournament, but you'll benefit so much in every other respect that it's more than worth it. Mutual encouragement and accountability is invaluable.
There are other good ideas for making resolutions work, or at least giving them the best possible chance to succeed, and maybe some readers can offer their own suggestions in the comments. I hope some of these ideas help my readers, though, and not only with their chess. And if you do have some chess goals for the new year, goals you're willing to work on and admit, maybe you can write those in the comments, too, and then look back a year from now and see how you did.
Happy New Year, everyone!
My goal, set more than a year ago, is simple: become an A Class player before I turn 50 (now less than 16 months away). The study methods expressed as New Year's resolutions are thus:
1. Control my addiction. That is, limit my online blitz to no more than five games on any day. I made this resolution two years ago, and kept it until April. In 2009, I'll do better.
2. Intensify my endgame training. Over the next several months, this means completing certain tasks begun several times in recent years, including mastering every one of the so-called "elementary positions" in Laszlo Polgar, Chess Endgames.
3. Develop consistency with a training program I began last June: ninety minutes per week against the computer from tactical positions in Reinfeld's 1001 Winning Chess Sacrifices and Combinations and other texts. Finding the tactic is not usually too difficult. Carrying the advantage to victory against the Silicon Monster often proves beyond my present capabilities. The idea is to develop stronger capabilities. I've already learned the benefits of playing certain kinds of positions successfully against Hiarcs 12, such as many rook endings that conceal within them a Lucena or Philidor motif. When I reach such a position OTB against a human, I have the necessary confidence to carry it through.
Of course, taking lessons from you is an excellent idea, but I'll settle for spending more of my time at Playchess in the radio room listening to your terrific lectures, instead of cultivating bad habits in the main playing hall.
And it is a matter of reforming and establishing good habits.
Don't say: "I resolve to improve my chess" - resolve to start a programme of analysing games and studying positional chess, tactics and so on - or say a few hours a week to endings etc That is be specific. (Leave "being World Champ" to Carlsen or whoever!)
And indeed 3 0 chess can be addictive but is not much help - for me only useful for a bit of practice for when I am short of time.
I don't think about any of my blitz games (I lose too many!)...unless it involves some problem in the opening etc
DONT PLAY ANY CHESS WHEN YOU ARE TIRED IF YOU CAN AVOID IT!
For blitz (but remember there are people who do nothing else so it can be vicious on there!) it means you will (mostly) lose and be discouraged and for longer serious games you will probably also lose...
Enter as many tourneys as you can - unless you (one) is or are stale. Don't neglect health or mental attitude - and get enough sleep - that is something I need to do! I have lost games simply by not sleeping the day before a game or games.
Once I stupidly studied the King's Gambit all night only to have my opponent refuse to accept and then me blunder later on in the late middle game &end game when very tired!
The methods of habit forming and problem solving used by psychologists we used to lose weight can be applied to chess study etc
One point - start with small amounts of study - this will mean you will probably progressively increase. 100 points in a year is a good goal.
I have been playing chess here in NZ for years (with fairly large breaks of sometimes 10 years or so) and am now 60 - but I came back into chess in 2000 (age 52) - was on NZ1800+ dropped down to about 1450 but then slowly - by studying (books and on the internet), solving problems (I always analyse myself I don't use computers except to check now and then -AND I try to follow all analyse in my mind so to speak - that is I don't move the pieces around* - or I do that as little as I can) thinking about strategy and openings, watching videos, being at lectures by GMs etc when possible, studying with a friend who is about NZ1900 (about 2000+ Elo) playing games...
...I started actually winning money (sure in the B Grade - but that was a first for me - and very exciting) and slowly my rating climbed up to NZ1800+ (about 1950 ELO) or so. I also (when I reached the A Grade) sometimes beat some of the strongest players in NZ. But being in the A Grade meant mostly that I got more interesting games.
This I feel shows improvements can be made no matter what one's age is - and perhaps regardless of present rating. I am quite fit and I don't drink - sorry! (For those who do).
My goal is to get to NZ 2000+ within 3 years. About 100 av points/year. I don't expect to get much higher very but that would be good considering my age and relative ability.
Any improvements are best done in small steps.
Stop when you are not enjoying chess.
*I have been doing this since I was about 10 in 1958!
they are also very informative.
One pointer to others - take in on info about chess in small "chunks" -
(memorising opening variations is something I am not good at and for me at this stage is pretty useless ... but IDEAS plans and systems - that is another matter!) - how I study is e.g in studying the English I play through games by GMs etc and think about the strategies and so on ... (Sure do some memorising if it is painless! But check out the moves..!)