First, they more often draw attention to games played in very strong events not generally considered to be "super-tournaments" than most of the instant-analysis sites. That's useful. Second, they do a nice job of noting trends, which is especially helpful when one is trying to orient oneself in a new opening. In sum, while those of you with easily maintained repertoires or a lack of interest in what the pros are doing in the openings needn't bother with CVO, I think it does have value for opening fanatics, and isn't rendered superfluous by ChessPublishing.com or Chess Today (or even this blog, or the conjunction of the three).
First, they more often draw attention to games played in very strong events not generally considered to be "super-tournaments" than most of the instant-analysis sites. That's useful. Second, they do a nice job of noting trends, which is especially helpful when one is trying to orient oneself in a new opening. In sum, while those of you with easily maintained repertoires or a lack of interest in what the pros are doing in the openings needn't bother with CVO, I think it does have value for opening fanatics, and isn't rendered superfluous by ChessPublishing.com or Chess Today (or even this blog, or the conjunction of the three).
As for posts in Ukranian, sure. :) Just let me know what you're writing first.