Thus endeth the ad; time now to quickly summarize my first ChessLecture presentation. I cover the two-bishop sacrifice best known from Lasker-Bauer, but take it a couple of steps further. First, I show a case where it works, despite the absence of some "canonical" feature (something you'd expect to be a part of the procedure, based on the Lasker-Bauer template), and then go on to show an instance where it fails, despite a seemingly ideal set of preconditions. The point is twofold: one should learn as many tactical themes as possible, but realize that the application of the model needs to be checked and not assumed.
Thus endeth the ad; time now to quickly summarize my first ChessLecture presentation. I cover the two-bishop sacrifice best known from Lasker-Bauer, but take it a couple of steps further. First, I show a case where it works, despite the absence of some "canonical" feature (something you'd expect to be a part of the procedure, based on the Lasker-Bauer template), and then go on to show an instance where it fails, despite a seemingly ideal set of preconditions. The point is twofold: one should learn as many tactical themes as possible, but realize that the application of the model needs to be checked and not assumed.