In 1993, I played in the Southern California Championship, and going into the last round, I was half a point behind my opponent. Our ratings were similar, but he had White and was having a great tournament (he won up twice), while I had played down every round and was in just my second event in five years. So when my opponent offered me a draw in the opening - an opening position I felt was slightly worse and much more in his bailiwick than my own - I accepted.
I felt like a bit of a wuss, but money was tight and I thought choosing the bird in the hand was the right decision. Even so, I'll never forget IM David Strauss telling me, afterwards, "I guess you don't really want to be the champion."
Turning to the big game of the day, Topalov played provocatively with Black, and Anand responded with a piece sac. White only had one pawn for the piece and a choice: take a draw by repetition and kiss any chance of winning the tournament goodbye, or take a risk on reasonable but admittedly speculative attacking prospects.
What should Anand do?
He has White, isn't rusty or playing badly, has all the money any normal person could want, and a lively position that, as far as the GMs and computers were concerned, admitted the possibility of all three results. The point of this event is to win the world championship, but rather than take the last real chance to derail the Topalov express - certainly
his last chance at the title - Anand decided to cash his chips, take the draw, and close up shop for the year.
Taking the draw was probably the objectively correct thing to do (but then why did Anand head for the sac in the first place? It could have been safely avoided), but unless the ensuing position was practically a forced loss, Anand should have fought on. What does it mean for his legacy if he concludes 2005 rated 2780 rather than 2785, or if he finishes this event in fourth rather than third or even a distant second? Chess historians remember who lost world championship events; chess fans remember the winners.
The bottom line: Anand doesn't really want to be the world champion.
An even more bloodless game was Polgar-Adams, but in this case it was understandable, given their position at the bottom of the crosstable. In the 1960s, Boris Spassky demonstrated that the Marshall Gambit was a potent drawing weapon (see
here and
here), which is why many players (including most especially Kasparov) avoid the Marshall with 8.a4, 8.h3, 8.d4 or accept it but avoid the old main line. Not today: Polgar went straight down the old mill stream, the current flowed where it always does, and the players agreed to a draw.
In the second most important game of the day, Svidler went for blood against Kasimjanov and for a while, it looked like he'd succeed in catching his prey. I fear that the drawn result and the game's relative unimportance will obscure its value, but I strongly encourage my readers to take a close look at the game from move 24 on. Kasimjanov set the board on fire there, and concluded the game with an absolutely
brilliant perpetual check idea. Really fantastic chess, but the bad news for Svidler is that he's not gaining any ground on Topalov - he remains two points behind.
"Oh yes, they call him the streak"
This 1970s novelty song by Ray Stevens can be applied to Alexander Morozevich, albeit (thankfully) in a different way than Mr. Stevens had in mind. After 6 rounds, Morozevich was -2 and tied for last, 3.5 points behind Topalov. Bad streaky. After today's (slightly lucky) win over Leko, Morozevich has won three in a row and has pulled within half a point of second place. Good streaky! Topalov is up next, and a now in-form Morozevich probably represents the last chance for a bump in the Bulgarian's road to the title.
It's probably too late, but at least Morozevich wants to be the champion.
Standings after Round 9:
Topalov 7.5
Svidler 5.5
Anand, Morozevich 5
Leko 4
Kasimjanov 3.5
Adams 3
Polgar 2.5
Pairings for Round 10:
Topalov-Morozevich
Leko-Svidler
Adams-Anand
Kasimjanov-Polgar
Predictions:
Topalov looks like he has switched into draw mode, and even though he has a big lead, it's a dangerous strategy. (I'm reminded of the "prevent" defense in (American) football, of which it is often said, aptly, that it only succeeds in preventing the team with the lead from winning.) Leko and Anand were cooperative enough, but I don't think Morozevich will be - Topalov will be forced to play. Fortunately, I think his great form, together with good preparation and possession of the White pieces will help him bring in the full point.
Svidler has been in good form, while Leko is probably discouraged by his setback with Morozevich. It's hard to see Leko losing with White though, so I'm predicting a draw; likewise, for Adams-Anand. Finally, I think Kasimjanov will hand Polgar another loss.
The games, with my annotations, are available
here.